Data Nexus

Check · 25 minutes · 5 questions

You now rank in the top ten for 47 keywords, up from 12.

Ask for these first

In writing, before the meeting. The request is half the check: everything below is one line to supply if it exists.

The keyword list itself, all of it
A count with no list is not checkable, and the list is where the answer usually is. Branded terms, your own company name, and phrases nobody searches all count towards a total and none of them was in contention.

The location, device and language the tracker was set to
A rank is measured from somewhere. Positions differ between a phone in Dubai and a desktop in Frankfurt, and a report that does not state which was used has not stated what it measured.

Monthly search volume for each keyword, from any source, stated
Separates forty-seven positions that people reach from forty-seven that nobody queries. The second is easy to produce deliberately.

Impressions and clicks for the same keywords from Search Console, same period
The engine's own record of where you actually appeared, for real queries by real people. It is a different instrument from the tracker and disagreement between them is the interesting part.
01/The questions
  1. 01

    How many of the forty-seven are branded?

    Your own name, product names and misspellings of both. You ranked for those before the engagement and will after it, so they measure the supplier's keyword list rather than their work.

    If insteadThe list is not supplied, or arrives with branded terms mixed in and unmarked.


  2. 02

    What is the search volume, and how much of the total sits below ten a month?

    A top-ten position on a phrase queried twice a year costs almost nothing to obtain and returns exactly that. The count rises, the business does not.

    If insteadVolume is described as “long tail” rather than given, or the totals are quoted without it.


  3. 03

    Do the tracked positions agree with Search Console for the same terms?

    Two instruments, one simulated and one recording real appearances. Close agreement means the tracker is configured sensibly. A tracker showing positions the engine's own data does not corroborate is measuring a search nobody performed.

    If insteadSearch Console access is not offered, or the comparison is declined as “not comparable” without saying why.


  4. 04

    What is above the result on the page?

    A rank counts the ten links. An AI overview, a map pack, a shopping row and four ads sit above them, and a third place under all of that is at the top of a list the reader never reaches.

    If insteadNobody has looked. Ask them to screenshot the actual result page for the three keywords they are proudest of.


  5. 05

    Did clicks move?

    The point of a position is a visitor. Positions improving with clicks flat, over a period long enough to matter, means the improvement happened where nobody was looking.

    If insteadClicks are reported from a different tool than the one used last month, or the comparison period is chosen to start at a trough.

02/What the answers mean
It is real
The list is supplied, branded terms are marked and excluded from the headline, the volumes are real, the tracker agrees with Search Console, and clicks moved with the positions. The report describes work.

It is not
The count survives only with branded or near-zero-volume terms included, or the tracker cannot be reconciled with the engine's own record. This does not mean nothing was done — it means the report does not show it, and a report that cannot show it should be replaced before the next invoice.

Cannot tell
Positions moved, clicks did not, and the results pages are full of features. That is a real and increasingly common outcome: the ranking was won and the traffic was never available. Worth saying aloud rather than resolving in either direction.
03/Where we failed it

Our own reporting on this domain

We sell ranking and citation reporting, and we run no rank tracker on our own site. Everything we know about our positions comes from Search Console — for the twenty-eight days to 16 August 2026, 1,950 impressions, 6 clicks, an average position of 35.9 across 192 queries. That is a better instrument than a tracker, because it records where we actually appeared rather than where a datacentre simulated it, and until this week we had not published anywhere what the difference is.

SinceThe vocabulary now says it: rank tracking, average position, impression and click each carry what they measure and what they cannot. Our own 0.3% click-through rate is the worked example on the CTR entry, chosen because a flattering one would have demonstrated less.

The words this uses
Rank tracking
A simulated search run on your behalf by a tool. It is not what your customer sees, and the distance between the two is the whole of what a ranking report leaves out.

Average position
The mean rank of your appearances weighted by how often each occurred — a single number averaging page one with page nine, and among the most misread statistics in search.

Impression
One appearance of your page in a result set a person was served — counted whether or not they ever scrolled far enough to see it.

Click
A click on your result in a search engine. It is not a session in your analytics, and the two will never reconcile.

SERP feature
Everything on a results page that is not one of the ten links — and most of it answers the question without sending anyone anywhere.

SEO
Making a site findable by search engines for the questions its buyers actually ask — a structural property of the site far more than a list of tasks performed on it.

Every checkThe whole glossary

Next

A supplier who cannot supply a base and a period has told you something, and it is not that they are disorganised. We do this for a living and the questions land differently when they come from outside.